can someone who actually plays TTT and has something of relevance to say say something instead of people who do nothing but troll.

Vulpes Inculta wrote:


I'll bite. I think you come across as immature professor. Not saying you are, but that's the initial reaction. Be a little more professional in dealing with topics on the forums, I know it's annoying because there are plenty of "users" who may cause you to become emotional within the thread, but still try to keep it cool.

From what I've seen on the server, either than you banning yourself you've done much better than 9 months ago. Even though my input won't be as valued due to not being on as often, it's a +support from me.

Honestly, from what I have seen from Prof. Tots he's done a fine job as a Admin on the TTT server. He hops on to ban people that have been posted onto the forums and he does a fine job on enforcing the rules. Only negative things I've seen is I have had to say something to him about a few people minging (though he said he was AFK), and how sometimes he is AFK for a long amount of time. Though I know he has to being something unique to the table when becoming a SA and I haven't been around too much to see what he has brought to the table.

I hope my "review" helps with the decision come the meeting. In the end if it came to a promo to any other position I'd definitely give a +support, but I haven't been around Professor enough here lately to give a +support for a SA promo. So for the SA Promo I'll have to give a -+Neutral. Good luck Professor.

DarthInFlames wrote:
Most all the times I'm afk it's either because I'm:

a.on the forums
b.looking into the person who's minging
c.dealing with another ban req or minge

Vulpes Inculta wrote:

coughcough*or playing mariokart*coughcough

Slyther wrote:

You know too much.....

Don't really play TTT due to recent circumstances but I think you would make a great Super Admin from what I saw on my short-lived TTT experience. +support

Vulpes Inculta wrote:




This whole debate actually proves Quade's point. If you we're actually trying to prove that you are mature enough for the position then you would say thanks for your opinion, and you'd try to work on it but you decided to call him "Quade you are the epitome of seriousness and maturity." If you think its true or not doesn't make you the good guy it just makes you look like a meanie bo beanie. I wouldn't of said a thing on this thread but since you're totally contradicting what you said in your app just of one persons opinion is appalling, especially if you're going for a position like Super Admin.

Jose wrote:
I didn't know that I had to be serious with every response I made. Considering I was joking. Are Super Admins supposed to be serious 100% of the time and not allowed to be sarcastic and have fun? Does poking fun and being sarcastic prove his point of me being immature? No, it doesn't. Using one sentence as a basis for maturity is asinine all in itself. You're thinking way too into it and coming to the conclusion that I was serious in any of what I said. I only said that to humor him and was engaging in it in a light-hearted way. To think you took any of what I said seriously and are replying in that manner is baffling to me, but as is common knowledge, sarcasm doesn't translate well through text. Did you really think I meant this:

"Not to mention I never actually said a curse word. I didn't know 'fukn' was a curse word. Please show me the definition and etymology of 'fukn'."

Of course I didn't. It's blatantly obvious what I meant and I'm not going to deny that I said and meant the f word. But judging an entire app and a person's maturity based off one word just makes a person look foolish and shows a lot about their character, especially when they do the same thing themselves. I always find it funny and ironic when others judge people for their language when they turn around and say they same things they proclaim are bad to use(this irony applies to me as well, only doing my job to stop people from violently cursing).

Same with this: "Also it is not against the rules according the ToU. It specifically states that profane MATERIAL is against the terms of use, never specifically states profanity."

There I'm just arguing BS semantics.

What I find appalling is people judging me and deeming me unworthy simply for having a little bit of fun. I never replied to his post to be mean. I replied to his post to poke fun and humor myself. As has happened many times in the past, I'm not going to be surprised if what I've said here is going to misconstrued in some form or another. I never said any of this to be seen as demeaning or in spite. I wrote this to prove a point that people take this stuff way too seriously and jump at people's throats for having any tiny bit of fun they deem bad, especially when they do the same things themselves.

People should be +/-supported based on their administrative qualities and actions. Not what they post on the forums. How can you truly know how someone would be as a super admin if you've never even played with them and experienced them as an admin?

Natsuki wrote:
Just by that gif alone, I'm assuming sarcasm. But I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt. *stares at intently*