Welcome,
Guest
|
|
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote:
Arena wrote: Arena wrote: ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: Nvidia Has amazing speed on games and i love it. Quite expensive but worth it. I have a GTX 690. So fast. lol 400 fps on Minecraft derp. Hehe, AMD Radeon HD 2GB. MC 125fps (keeps stuck on that for some reason) Unless I turn particles to minimum and smooth lightning to minimum, that bumps it up to a fluxuating 700-1100fps GMod 270-300fps CSS 300fps PlanetSide 2 60fps (That game is seriously heavy as ... as, you know) LOL On PlanetSide 2(by the way i love that game) I get like 400 fps. Are you sure you have your graphics settings on ultra and have all the extras enabled? xD |
|
...
|
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote:
PetrolHead247 wrote: ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: I Just conducted a test and it turns out on my PC its 1700 FPS lol. Yeah but that's minecraft... It's incredibly easy to run, and for a card like a GTX690 it's a joke AHAHAHAHA On arma 2 and arma 3 i get about maybe 2500 FPS. So realistic with it. pictures or it didnt happen |
|
don't ban me please
|
Arena wrote:
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: Arena wrote: Arena wrote: ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: Nvidia Has amazing speed on games and i love it. Quite expensive but worth it. I have a GTX 690. So fast. lol 400 fps on Minecraft derp. Hehe, AMD Radeon HD 2GB. MC 125fps (keeps stuck on that for some reason) Unless I turn particles to minimum and smooth lightning to minimum, that bumps it up to a fluxuating 700-1100fps GMod 270-300fps CSS 300fps PlanetSide 2 60fps (That game is seriously heavy as ... as, you know) LOL On PlanetSide 2(by the way i love that game) I get like 400 fps. Are you sure you have your graphics settings on ultra and have all the extras enabled? xD Yes I do Arena. |
|
|
Gotta go with AMD here. Cheap and powerful.
|
|
|
Slappy wrote:
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: PetrolHead247 wrote: ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: I Just conducted a test and it turns out on my PC its 1700 FPS lol. Yeah but that's minecraft... It's incredibly easy to run, and for a card like a GTX690 it's a joke AHAHAHAHA On arma 2 and arma 3 i get about maybe 2500 FPS. So realistic with it. pictures or it didnt happen Yeah lol... 2500 fps on arma........................... SCREENIES RIGHT HERE RIGHT NOW |
|
|
Guys he's a troll, you cant get 2500fps on such a poorly optimized game. I average about 50fps on DayZ Namalsk with a 670 so yeah
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: Owns GTX 670... AHAHAH HE HAS A GTX 670 Yes, haha, so funny... Seeing as you seem to have absolutely no knowledge on hardware i don't believe you have a GTX 690, doubt you even know what any of your specs are. Ohhh hurhurhur 40000000000fps on arma hurrrr. |
|
PC Specs:
Warning: Spoiler! CPU: Intel Core i5 2500K Mobo: Asus P8P67 GPU: Asus GTX670 DirectCu-II RAM: 2x4GB Corsair Vengeance LP 1600MHz 1.35V CPU Cooler: Corsair H100 w/ Corsair SP120 QE Fans SSD: Samsung 830 256GB HDD: Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB PSU: Corsair AX650 w/ White Braided Cables Case: Fractal Design Arc Midi
Last Edit: 11 years, 1 month ago by PetrolHead247.
The following user(s) said Thank You: Slappy
|
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote:
PetrolHead247 wrote: ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: I Just conducted a test and it turns out on my PC its 1700 FPS lol. Yeah but that's minecraft... It's incredibly easy to run, and for a card like a GTX690 it's a joke AHAHAHAHA On arma 2 and arma 3 i get about maybe 2500 FPS. So realistic with it. Wow...What do you gain from lying about something like that? Does it make your epenis bigger? |
|
|
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote:
PetrolHead247 wrote: ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: I Just conducted a test and it turns out on my PC its 1700 FPS lol. Yeah but that's minecraft... It's incredibly easy to run, and for a card like a GTX690 it's a joke AHAHAHAHA On arma 2 and arma 3 i get about maybe 2500 FPS. So realistic with it. I have GTX 690 myself. I AVG 60-70 fps on Arma 2 and roughly the same on Arma 3. It is indeed poorly optimized and Arma 3 is still in alpha. While Arma 3 is better optimized it has better particle effects and in general better graphics. You saying 1700 FPS on MC, and then 2500 on Arma 2 and Arma 3 makes so sense to me whatsoever. You're actually claiming that MC is more taxing on your GPU than Arma 2 and 3. I don't even.... |
|
|
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote:
PetrolHead247 wrote: ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: I Just conducted a test and it turns out on my PC its 1700 FPS lol. Yeah but that's minecraft... It's incredibly easy to run, and for a card like a GTX690 it's a joke AHAHAHAHA On arma 2 and arma 3 i get about maybe 2500 FPS. So realistic with it. How do you have 400 FPS on minecraft but have 2500 fps on a ARMA 2, a game which even some of the most expensive PCs have problems with. Either you have the best computer in the world or you're a liar. Don't worry, you don't have to try and impress us. |
|
Naughty Cawn.
|
Sparkey wrote:
ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: PetrolHead247 wrote: ImThatPeterGriffin wrote: I Just conducted a test and it turns out on my PC its 1700 FPS lol. Yeah but that's minecraft... It's incredibly easy to run, and for a card like a GTX690 it's a joke AHAHAHAHA On arma 2 and arma 3 i get about maybe 2500 FPS. So realistic with it. Wow...What do you gain from lying about something like that? Does it make your epenis bigger? He thinks that we will rhino he's cool beacuse he had "2500" frames per second Even if he had its not even useful..... The Eye doesnt see a difference between 200 and above |
|
don't ban me please
|