Jarva wrote:


Jarva, im just gonna say this. The ban on you was right on darkreapers part. And you put a demote on me cause I supported his decision. You are honestly an half-wit for lying on this telling a fake story. I'm done arguing and just starting drama. It doesn't matter to me if I get demoted or not. I can just apply again if it comes to the case. And one last time Jarva, your a silly billy.

Jose wrote:

Oh no, I am not demoting you for supporting him. Did you even read the OP? Also, I don't mind if you don't get demoted, I would just like Dark to be punished for the things he did and you just happened to be involved in those wrong doings.

I knew you were not to be trusted as a staff member, Jarva.

Hopefully you understand my warnings and advices next time, if there will be one.

And for this Demotion request on Jose and Darkreaper, I -Support, no evidence.

xDrayken wrote:

I understand your opinion and accept your decision but would you do me the favour of saying how I could get evidence against something that I cannot access. I cannot access server logs to show the conversation between me and Dark, which I did not screenshot because I didn't think it would turn into anything. I didn't screenshot the Jose incident because I thought nothing of it. It was just yet another player trying to troll.

Crocodile wrote:


I'm not going to give him powers or unban him, it was a 1 week ban and he deserved it. By unbanning him or giving him powers I am essentially giving in to him, which I refuse to do because I know for a fact he will rub it in as he has done before.

EDIT: If he wants unbanning, let him make an unban request crocodile. And also if you guys don't understand what happened then don't get involved. Of course he is gonna tell you he was in the right, everyone would in his situation, however not everyone knows what actually happened and has happened in the past with him.

EDIT2: He is perfectly welcome to make another trusted application after his unbanning, and assuming he puts in enough effort and doesn't make it a troll application he still has a chance of getting trusted.

Darkreaper wrote:

Dark, referring to your first edit, please tell me what has happened with me in the past because I don't know. Also could you tell me what I have "rubbed in" before?

Ok to start out let me say I have no idea why you were demoted or anything like that Jarva. Nor do I really want to know (as it really doesn't concern me). But after the troll JB SA app that you posted I really find it hard to believe any thing that you say. That added with the fact that their is no evidence to support this, I really have to -Support

LOL @ Jarva is this another one of your troll posts or something? They had a meeting and they said that you should be demoted, now you want them to demote themselves?

Mez wrote:

But the thing is, they demoted for doing nothing wrong. Also this was more to make the forum aware of what they have done, I knew they would never be demoted because they are such high rank but I wanted to make sure everyone knows what kind of owner Darkreaper is.

Jarva wrote:


I've seen many times where you call me on to get people banned that most of the time have broken maybe 1 rule and all that would be needed is a simple freeze. You also RDM a lot, if one person steps a foot inside your property you are extremely immature about it and make it a 1 second countdown, most likely just to boost your score. With the rubbing in thing, the other day when you started arguing with me and I just said I am not going to argue any more with you, you decided to say "Oh yeah don't say anything because you know I'll beat you in an argument."

Just so you know, before you made this I was considering talking it over with you, but you really pushed it too far. And with me apparently "punishing innocents", I saw three people stood around that tree, you were all purposely trying to get rid of every single one of their trees, even after you knew that they had called an admin. You all had the same tribe colour and I saw all three names above heads. It seems that this is your only so called "proof" against me, and its pathetic.